Hooters and the EEOC Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Hooters and the EEOC - Essay ExampleAs found in Leonard, Steenberg, Howard and Mullins (1998), according to Title VII of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, in those certain instances wheresexis a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business (p. C-663) a company or entitys decision to fill based upon gender is not illegal or discriminatory. The EEOC has specific criteria within which these exceptions must fall, ironically one of the examples they listed was a Playboy Bunny. This brought to mind one questionWhats the digression between a Playboy Bunny and a Hooter Girl The answer is simple other than the tail and ears - nothing. Both are selling an throw - that is their primary focus food and drink, in both cases, is secondary. Perhaps the main problem was, Hooters attempted to hide behind the guise of a family oriented restaurant.several(prenominal) court cases defining the scope of BFOQ establish precedent for uph olding Hooters right to require their front line staff to be female. In the case of St. Cross v Playboy Club, CFS 22618-70 the court held that in jobs where sex or vicarious sexual recreation is the primary service providedbeing female was deemed a BFOQ (Leonard et al, 1998, p. C-664).As previously discussed in that respect is no distinction here.